In a recent episode from Planet Money, the contrast in parental benefits between the United States and several other countries is starkly presented. The U.S. finds itself in a unique position among the world's nations, with no federal mandate for paid parental leave, effectively no public childcare system, and the high cost of private childcare options. This financial strain is particularly acute for women, who often experience a decrease in earnings post-maternity, unlike men, who may see an increase in wages after becoming fathers.
This disparity in support for new parents points to a broader societal issue. As the podcast host Mary Childs notes, "It is so expensive to have a kid in the United States...and women can expect their pay to take a hit after becoming a parent." This situation is juxtaposed with countries that are facing demographic challenges, including an aging workforce and declining birth rates. Nations such as Sweden, Singapore, South Korea, Estonia, and Canada are actively seeking to reverse these trends by offering generous parental benefits. These range from substantial paid leave for both parents to straight-up cash incentives for having children.
The rationale behind such policies is clear: to encourage a higher birth rate that can sustain future generations of workers and taxpayers. This approach not only aims to address the immediate economic challenges but also to ensure long-term societal stability and growth.
Childs's exploration of benefits around the world, or "benefits shopping," underscores a critical opportunity for the U.S. to reconsider its stance on parental support. By examining the policies of countries that actively incentivize parenthood, the U.S. could find sustainable solutions to its own demographic and economic challenges.
The episode, titled “Shopping for Parental Benefits Around the World,” provides a personal insight into the choices families must navigate in the face of varying international policies. This perspective is crucial for understanding the economic and societal implications of parental benefits—or the lack thereof.
My favorite part of that story was the incentive effect of the "speed Premium" in Sweden -- have another child within a few years (1-3?) of a previous child and women are guaranteed no drop in pay after the first child. And child bearing was sped up! I plan to use this one in class as an example that incentives matter.