Discover more from Economics with Dr. A
Nudges, Confidence Teaching Personal Finance, and Homeownership
Research Corner is a new series developed by the Economics with Dr. A team.
Our goal is to help increase awareness of the diverse questions economists ask, and the areas in which future economists can contribute. Economics is a broad field with diverse interests.
Stay connected, join our newsletter
Choice architecture tools, also known as nudges, have the power to significantly influence decisions and improve overall welfare. However, it is uncertain which individuals are most affected by these nudges. If the effects of nudges are influenced by socioeconomic status (SES), it could either increase or decrease disparities among consumers. Through the use of field data and several studies that were preregistered, the authors of this research demonstrate that consumers with lower SES, limited domain knowledge, and lower numerical ability are more susceptible to the impact of various nudges.
Interestingly, the study reveals that "good nudges" designed to promote the selection of superior options effectively reduce choice disparities, leading to better decision-making outcomes, particularly among consumers with lower SES, limited financial literacy, and lower numeracy levels. On the other hand, "bad nudges" aimed at facilitating the selection of inferior options exacerbate choice disparities, worsening decision outcomes for these same individuals. These findings hold true across various real-life retirement decisions, different types of nudges, and diverse decision domains.
Throughout the studies, the authors explore different explanations for why SES, domain knowledge, and numeracy moderate the effects of nudges. The results suggest that nudges can be a valuable tool for reducing disparities among individuals. The research concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for marketing firms and the practice of segmentation.
Overall, this research sheds light on the impact of nudges and their potential to either narrow or increase disparities among individuals, emphasizing their usefulness for those seeking to promote more equitable decision-making outcomes.
How Confident Are Personal Finance Teachers? A Survey of High School Instructors in the United States
As the demand for personal finance education increases among high school students, nonprofit organizations and regional universities have stepped up to provide professional development opportunities for aspiring personal finance teachers. State and school district requirements have made personal finance courses a necessity, leading to a surge in training initiatives. However, the existing evaluation of teacher confidence and dispositions in light of these developments remains insufficient. This article addresses this gap by utilizing unique data collected from high school teachers to estimate their levels of confidence, participation in professional development, and attitudes towards teaching personal finance courses.
The findings of the study indicate that an impressive 95% of teachers feel confident in their ability to teach personal finance. Interestingly, teachers who possess licenses in subjects other than business or economics are more likely to pursue professional development programs focused on personal finance instruction. A substantial 86% of teachers express their support for making personal finance instruction a graduation requirement in high schools.
These results imply that high schools possess the necessary resources and capacity to effectively teach personal finance. However, they also highlight the crucial need for easily accessible and cost-effective professional development opportunities. By addressing this requirement, educators can enhance their instructional skills and effectively meet the growing demand for personal finance education among high school students.
In this article, the authors delve into the underlying factors behind the remarkable surge in homeownership from 1994 to 2005, with a primary focus on two key elements: demographic changes and mortgage innovations. To comprehensively evaluate the influence of these factors, the authors construct a sophisticated mathematical model that simulates the economy and incorporates the dynamics of the housing market.
Through their analysis, the authors reveal that mortgage innovations play a substantial role in explaining between 56% to 70% of the overall increase in homeownership in the long run. On the other hand, demographic changes have a comparatively smaller impact on this phenomenon. To validate their findings, the authors also conduct an examination of historical mortgage data dating back to 1940. Their investigation provides compelling evidence that the introduction of the conventional fixed-rate mortgage alone accounts for at least 50% of the observed surge in homeownership during that specific period.
This research sheds light on the driving forces behind the significant growth in homeownership, highlighting the significant contribution of mortgage innovations and the relatively modest influence of demographic changes. By employing advanced mathematical modeling techniques and historical data analysis, the authors provide valuable insights into the dynamics of the housing market and its relationship with mortgage systems over time.